On 07/01/2019 08:59, Jan Beulich wrote: >> @@ -271,6 +297,27 @@ int parse_boolean(const char *name, const char *s, >> const char *e) >> return -1; >> } >> >> +int cmdline_strcmp(const char *frag, const char *name) > So you've decided to retain the strcmp()-like return type and value, > despite them being of no interest to any caller, and it being > vanishingly unlikely for a caller to appear which would care. Fine > for now, but I'd still like to understand why.
You already asked this, and give no objection to my answer, I presumed you were satisfied with the concrete usecase I gave, citing a patch needing this behaviour which has already been posted to the list. <bff3c33d-a244-362a-529c-32f91b5f3...@citrix.com> ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
