George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model 
asynchronous"):
> It looks cleaner to me to have *something* there than not, just to visually 
> make it clear that it has nothing to do with the previous function.

That's OK by me.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to