>>> On 13.09.18 at 18:01, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:15:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 04.09.18 at 18:15, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> >> > --- >> > v3: longer text >> > v2: use tab to indent >> > >> > Haven't added a dependency on PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE because agreement is >> > not yet reached. >> >> Hmm, but then I would have expected you to at least do the minimal >> agreed upon change (modifying that other option's default). Beyond >> that I'm afraid we're moving towards a dead end here. >> > > I extended the help text to address Andrew's comment. Other than that, I > didn't see an agreement on "other option's default". What did I miss?
I don't think there was disagreement on this minimal change (in fact iirc Andrew explicitly agreed to it [1]). What we can't seem to agree on is whether to add a "depends on !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE" to HVM. Jan [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-08/msg02408.html _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
