On 31/08/18 09:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 31.08.18 at 09:12, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >> On 31/08/18 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 31.08.18 at 08:43, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 31/08/18 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>>> On 30.08.18 at 19:08, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 30/08/18 15:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 30.08.18 at 14:31, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> The observant amongst you might realise that this reverts parts of c/s >>>>>>>> 51ad90aea21c - What can I say? Several years of hindsight is very >>>>>>>> useful, >> and >>>>>>>> at the time I did ask the maintainers which option they thought would >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> better... >>>>>>> ... I think both the earlier and this change are heading in the >>>>>>> wrong direction: I would much rather see the newline omitted >>>>>>> everywhere, _including_ in panic() itself: This causes one line >>>>>>> less to scroll off the screen in case you don't have a serial >>>>>>> console. >>>> >>>> Can't we just drop printing the extra \n in panic()? >>>> >>>> - printk("%s\n", buf); >>>> + printk("%s", buf); >>> >>> That's what I'm suggesting, yes, plus (if there are any) dropping >>> trailing newlines in panic() invocations. >> >> Uuh, both? >> >> This would look like: >> >> *********************************** >> PANIC on cpu 2: >> blalblabla********************************** > > Hmm, the trailing **** would perhaps better also be dropped. As per > my original reply to Andrew, the goal should imo be to have as little > useless output as possible (but as much as necessary/helpful, i.e. I'm > not suggesting to drop the first line of stars), to avoid meaningful > lines scrolling off.
I don't think: *********************************** PANIC on cpu 2: blalblablaReboot in five seconds... is what we want. So one '\n' should stay: either when printing the panic message, or in the panic message itself. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel