>>> On 31.08.18 at 08:43, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote:
> On 31/08/18 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 30.08.18 at 19:08, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> On 30/08/18 15:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30.08.18 at 14:31, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>> The observant amongst you might realise that this reverts parts of c/s
>>>>> 51ad90aea21c - What can I say? Several years of hindsight is very
>>>>> useful, and
>>>>> at the time I did ask the maintainers which option they thought would be
>>>>> better...
>>>> ... I think both the earlier and this change are heading in the
>>>> wrong direction: I would much rather see the newline omitted
>>>> everywhere, _including_ in panic() itself: This causes one line
>>>> less to scroll off the screen in case you don't have a serial
>>>> console.
>
> Can't we just drop printing the extra \n in panic()?
>
> - printk("%s\n", buf);
> + printk("%s", buf);
That's what I'm suggesting, yes, plus (if there are any) dropping
trailing newlines in panic() invocations.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
