On 14.08.2025 16:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/08/2025 3:47 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.08.2025 22:23, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>>> @@ -63,6 +63,14 @@ LABEL(s3_resume)
>>>          pushq   %rax
>>>          lretq
>>>  1:
>>> +
>>> +        GET_STACK_END(15)
>>> +
>>> +        /* Enable minimal CR4 features. */
>>> +        mov     $XEN_MINIMAL_CR4, %eax
>>> +        mov     %rax, STACK_CPUINFO_FIELD(cr4)(%r15)
>> Strictly speaking this and ...
>>
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S
>>> @@ -11,16 +11,19 @@ ENTRY(__high_start)
>>>          mov     %ecx,%gs
>>>          mov     %ecx,%ss
>>>  
>>> -        /* Enable minimal CR4 features. */
>>> -        mov     $XEN_MINIMAL_CR4,%rcx
>>> -        mov     %rcx,%cr4
>>> -
>>>          mov     stack_start(%rip),%rsp
>>>  
>>>          /* Reset EFLAGS (subsumes CLI and CLD). */
>>>          pushq   $0
>>>          popf
>>>  
>>> +        GET_STACK_END(15)
>>> +
>>> +        /* Enable minimal CR4 features. */
>>> +        mov     $XEN_MINIMAL_CR4, %eax
>>> +        mov     %rax, STACK_CPUINFO_FIELD(cr4)(%r15)
>> ... this could be 32-bit stores, even in the longer run.
> 
> ... no, they can't.
> 
> The store also serves to clear out stale X86_CR4_FRED, prior to FRED
> getting reconfigured again.
> 
> fatal_trap() uses info->cr4 to decide whether it's safe to look at the
> extended FRED metadata.  Strictly speaking I probably ought to read the
> real CR4 (in read_registers too), but using a 32bit store here would
> extend a 1-instruction window into quite a larger window where exception
> handling would not work quite right.

Oh, I see. Mind me asking to add brief comments there to this effect?

Jan

Reply via email to