On 12/08/2025 9:06 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.08.2025 22:22, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> The name AMD chose is rather more concise. >> >> No functional change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > I'm okay with the (much) shorter name, so: > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Thanks. > > But I can't make the connection to AMD: It's INTERRUPT_SST_TABLE (figure) > or INTERRUPT_SSP_TABLE (text) there, afaics. And ISST_ADDR in yet further > places. ISST has a better association with IST than the long form, which is ambiguous if turned into an initialism. The ADDR suffix I dropped like we do elsewhere. But now you point it out, there is a confusing mix in AMD. I'm pretty sure SST is a plain typo, and I've fed this back. I'll tweak the wording a little bit. ~Andrew