On 30.07.2025 00:18, dm...@proton.me wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 26.07.2025 11:20, Julien Grall wrote: >>> On 25/07/2025 22:24, dm...@proton.me wrote: >>>> From: Denis Mukhin <dmuk...@ford.com> >>>> >>>> __printk_ratelimit() is never used outside of the console driver. >>>> Remove it from the lib.h and merge with the public printk_ratelimit(). >>> >>> Is this solving any sort of violation? Asking because even if the >>> function is only used by one caller, I could see a benefit to be able to >>> use different value for the ratelimit. So I leaning towards keep the >>> code as-is. >> >> +1 >> >> In fact I'm surprised (or maybe not) that we still don't make better use >> the rate limiting functionality. > > Out of curiosity, do you have any ideas re: make better use of the rate > limiting functionality?
No concrete ones; thinking about this has been way too long ago. > Build-time parameterization? That and/or command line controls. Jan
