On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 26.07.2025 11:20, Julien Grall wrote: > > On 25/07/2025 22:24, dm...@proton.me wrote: > >> From: Denis Mukhin <dmuk...@ford.com> > >> > >> __printk_ratelimit() is never used outside of the console driver. > >> Remove it from the lib.h and merge with the public printk_ratelimit(). > > > > Is this solving any sort of violation? Asking because even if the > > function is only used by one caller, I could see a benefit to be able to > > use different value for the ratelimit. So I leaning towards keep the > > code as-is. > > +1 > > In fact I'm surprised (or maybe not) that we still don't make better use > the rate limiting functionality.
Out of curiosity, do you have any ideas re: make better use of the rate limiting functionality? Build-time parameterization? > > Jan >
