Hi Michal, > On 17 Jul 2025, at 13:54, Orzel, Michal <michal.or...@amd.com> wrote: >> + /* >> + * DTB starting at a different address has been mapped, so destroy this >> + * before continuing. > I don't understand this scenario. Can you describe it in more details? > I know that early_fdt_map will be called twice. First time, mapped_fdt_base == > INVALID_PADDR and second time, mapped_fdt_base == fdt_paddr. What's the other > option? > > ~Michal >
This was intended as more of a sanity check than a situation that was expected to occur. Maybe you think it makes more sense to remove this and just add an assert that `mapped_fdt_base == INVALID_PADDR` here? Cheers, Hari