On 3/17/25 08:50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 14/3/25 18:31, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org>
---
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index f5d574261a3..92e8708af76 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -339,7 +339,9 @@ static inline void
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start,
}
}
- xen_hvm_modified_memory(start, length);
+ if (xen_enabled()) {
+ xen_hvm_modified_memory(start, length);
Please remove the stub altogether.
We can eventually ifdef this code under CONFIG_XEN, but it may still be
available or not. The matching stub for xen_hvm_modified_memory() will
assert in case it is reached.
Which change would you expect precisely?
+ }
}
