Hi,
On 14/3/25 19:39, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 3/14/25 11:34, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:33:08AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
one patch is missing review:
[PATCH v5 12/17] hw/xen: add stubs for various functions.
My "Acked-by" wasn't enough? Feel free try change it to "Reviewed-by"
instead.
Those are differents. From what I understand, Reviewed implies Acked,
but the opposite is not true. If it was, they would be equivalent.
Thanks.
IIUC on QEMU Acked-by means "as a maintainer of files modified by
this patch, I don't have objection on my area, as long as someone
else takes the patch". It doesn't mean the patch has been reviewed.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
Phil.
