On Tuesday, December 10th, 2024 at 5:33 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 06.12.2024 05:41, Denis Mukhin via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vpl011.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/vpl011.h
> > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct vpl011_init_info {
> > int domain_vpl011_init(struct domain *d,
> > struct vpl011_init_info *info);
> > void domain_vpl011_deinit(struct domain *d);
> > -void vpl011_rx_char_xen(struct domain *d, char c);
> > +int vpl011_rx_char_xen(struct domain *d, char c);
>
>
> If you make the function return an error indicator, ...
>
> > --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> > @@ -559,9 +559,7 @@ static void __serial_rx(char c)
> > * domain, without a full PV ring to Dom0 (in that case input
> > * comes from the PV ring), then send the character to it.
> > */
> > - if ( d != NULL &&
> > - !d->arch.vpl011.backend_in_domain &&
> > - d->arch.vpl011.backend.xen != NULL )
> > + if ( d != NULL )
> > vpl011_rx_char_xen(d, c);
> > else
> > printk("Cannot send chars to Dom%d: no UART available\n",
>
>
> ... how come that return value then isn't used anywhere?
That I overlooked; fixed.
>
> Jan
