On 17/10/2024 11:58 am, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 4:05 PM Frediano Ziglio > <frediano.zig...@cloud.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:25 PM Anthony PERARD >> <anthony.per...@vates.tech> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 2:51 PM Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@vates.tech> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 05:32:26PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:31 PM Anthony PERARD >>>>>> <anthony.per...@vates.tech> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >>>>>>>> +# generate final object file combining and checking above binaries >>>>>>>> +$(obj)/built_in_32.S: $(obj)/built_in_32.other.bin >>>>>>>> $(obj)/built_in_32.final.bin >>>>>>> So, "other" isn't part of "final", I don't really know what those two >>>>>>> things contains so naming wise I can't suggest anything useful. >>>>> Instead of "other", is "control" (like in science experiment where you >>>>> have a control group), or "offseted" (which seems to be how this second >>>>> binary is constructed) would be better names for this *.bin? It seems >>>>> the script take both input and play the game of the 7 differences, to >>>>> find clues about the location of some symbols, right?. >>>>> >>>> I don't know the game and I think people not familiar with it won't >>>> find new names more readable but less. >>> Sorry, the "game" as nothing to do with the name I've proposed. I was >>> just asking if the script take both *.bin and was looking for >>> differences. >>> >>> (The game of 7 differences is simple: there's two similar pictures and >>> you just look for the 7 differences between them, that's it.) >>> >>>> Not saying that current names are good, they just need to be located >>>> at different addresses with some "magic" in the middle. >>> Well to me "other" evoke a binary that contains functions that are not >>> in "final", but instead they both contain the sames functions with >>> slight variation of placement in the file (with added offset, gap), as I >>> understand. But if you don't like my proposal, so be it. >>> >> What about "base" and "offsetted" ? I don't know why "offsetted" >> sounds weird to me but I didn't find anything better. I hope some >> native English speaker could come with a better proposal. >> > What about "base" and "bias"/"biased" ?
A plain "offset" would be fine in this context. "offsetted" is indeed wrong English. ~Andrew
