On 27/06/18 17:00, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:58:08PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 27/06/18 15:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 27.06.18 at 15:55, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> @@ -316,6 +319,33 @@ static void __init calculate_raw_policy(void)
>>>> cpuid_count_leaf(7, i, &p->feat.raw[i]);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + if ( p->basic.max_leaf >= 0xb )
>>>> + {
>>>> + union {
>>>> + struct cpuid_leaf l;
>>>> + struct cpuid_topo_leaf t;
>>>> + } u;
>>>> +
>>>> + for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->topo.raw); ++i )
>>>> + {
>>>> + cpuid_count_leaf(0xb, i, &u.l);
>>>> +
>>>> + if ( u.t.type == 0 )
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + p->topo.subleaf[i] = u.t;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The choice of CPUID_GUEST_NR_TOPO is per the manual. It may
>>>> need
>>>> + * to grow for future harware.
>>> Missing d.
>> Where? I'm afraid that after repeated re-reads, I can't spot any issue.
>>
> har d ware. ;p
Wow I'm blind. Thanks.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
