On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:58:08PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 27/06/18 15:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 27.06.18 at 15:55, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> @@ -316,6 +319,33 @@ static void __init calculate_raw_policy(void)
> >> cpuid_count_leaf(7, i, &p->feat.raw[i]);
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if ( p->basic.max_leaf >= 0xb )
> >> + {
> >> + union {
> >> + struct cpuid_leaf l;
> >> + struct cpuid_topo_leaf t;
> >> + } u;
> >> +
> >> + for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->topo.raw); ++i )
> >> + {
> >> + cpuid_count_leaf(0xb, i, &u.l);
> >> +
> >> + if ( u.t.type == 0 )
> >> + break;
> >> +
> >> + p->topo.subleaf[i] = u.t;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * The choice of CPUID_GUEST_NR_TOPO is per the manual. It may
> >> need
> >> + * to grow for future harware.
> > Missing d.
>
> Where? I'm afraid that after repeated re-reads, I can't spot any issue.
>
har d ware. ;p
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
