On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 16:05 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 05.02.2024 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > No specific header is needed to include in public/hvm/save.h for > > PPC and RISC-V for now. > > > > Code related to PPC was changed based on the comment: > > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/c2f3280e-2208-496b-a0b5-fda1a2076...@raptorengineering.com/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com> > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Albeit I don't see why ... > > > --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/save.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/save.h > > @@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(END, 0, struct > > hvm_save_end); > > #include "../arch-x86/hvm/save.h" > > #elif defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) > > #include "../arch-arm/hvm/save.h" > > -#elif defined(__powerpc64__) > > -#include "../arch-ppc.h" > > +#elif defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__riscv) > > +/* no specific header to include */ > > #else > > ... this isn't simply > > #elif !defined(__powerpc64__) && !defined(__riscv) I can change that to your option in the next patch version if the patch won't be merged now.
~ Oleksii > > > #error "unsupported architecture" > > #endif >
