On 28/11/23 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.11.2023 10:46, Federico Serafini wrote:
Uniform declaration and definition of guest_walk_tables() using
parameter name "pfec_walk":
this name highlights the connection with PFEC_* constants and it is
consistent with the use of the parameter within function body.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.seraf...@bugseng.com>
I'm curious what other x86 maintainers think. I for one don't like this,
but not enough to object if others are happy. That said, there was earlier
discussion (and perhaps even a patch), yet without a reference I don't
think I can locate this among all the Misra bits and pieces.
The last thread about guest_walk_tables():
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-10/msg02055.html
Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this?
--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.
Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)
