On 24.11.2023 12:59, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> @@ -3333,19 +3318,18 @@ static int __init alloc_domain_evtchn(struct
> dt_device_node *node)
> rc = evtchn_alloc_unbound(&alloc_unbound, domU1_port);
> if ( rc < 0 )
> {
> - printk(XENLOG_ERR
> - "evtchn_alloc_unbound() failure (Error %d) \n", rc);
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "evtchn_alloc_unbound() failure (Error %d) \n", rc);
> return rc;
> }
> - bind_interdomain.remote_dom = d1->domain_id;
> + bind_interdomain.remote_dom = d1->domain_id;
> bind_interdomain.remote_port = domU1_port;
> rc = evtchn_bind_interdomain(&bind_interdomain, d2, domU2_port);
> if ( rc < 0 )
> {
>
> Assignment of bind_interdomain.remote_dom was aligned with the following
> line, but since the value
> of this configurable is “None”, clang-format is modifying that to use only
> one space before the assignment
> operator.
Neither here nor ...
> One example related to macros can be found on line 1663:
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/insn.c b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/insn.c
> index 49953a042a..1635c4b6d1 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/insn.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/insn.c
> @@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> /* Mask of branch instructions' immediate. */
> -#define BRANCH_INSN_IMM_MASK GENMASK(23, 0)
> +#define BRANCH_INSN_IMM_MASK GENMASK(23, 0)
> /* Shift of branch instructions' immediate. */
> -#define BRANCH_INSN_IMM_SHIFT 0
> +#define BRANCH_INSN_IMM_SHIFT 0
>
> Clang format sees the comment between BRANCH_INSN_IMM_MASK and
> BRANCH_INSN_IMM_SHIFT and
> even if before the value of the macros were aligned, it applies the rule of
> one space between the macro name
> and the value.
... here there is any change in the formatting on the lines in question.
I was first suspecting a possible issue with my mail UI, but
https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-11/msg02132.html
looks to confirm the issue to more likely be on your end (apparently also
resulting in leading whitespace having been dropped).
Jan
