On 07.06.2023 05:02, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>  #include <xen/spinlock.h>
>  #include <public/domctl.h>
>  #include <public/hvm/ioreq.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#endif

This header is supposed to be usable without #ifdef, and then ...

> @@ -228,12 +232,28 @@ int iommu_release_dt_devices(struct domain *d);
>   *      (IOMMU is not enabled/present or device is not connected to it).
>   */
>  int iommu_add_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np);
> +int iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  
>  int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *, struct domain *,
>                         XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t));
>  
> +#else /* !HAS_DEVICE_TREE */
> +static inline int iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +    return 0;
> +}
>  #endif /* HAS_DEVICE_TREE */
>  
> +static inline int iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +    int ret = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +    if ( acpi_disabled )
> +#endif

... you don't need #ifdef here either.

> +        ret = iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(pdev);
> +    return ret;
> +}

Also (nit) please follow (partly unwritten, I admit) style guidelines:
A blank line between declaration(s) and statement(s), and another one
ahead of a function's main "return".

Jan

Reply via email to