Hi,
On 6/5/23 12:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 02/06/2023 08:45, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 02/06/2023 02:48, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h
b/xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5615decaff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+ /*
incorrect indentation (<< 1)
+ * xen/iommu-private.h
+ *
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
+ * Written by Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garh...@amd.com>
I'm not sure if placing the copyright is appropriate, given a single
prototype for a function
not really implemented by you with just spinlocks removed. But I
might be wrong.
I agree. If you want to add a copyright then it should be the one from
the original author.
But in this case, I don't think we should add an copyright as there is
nothing really interesting in the header.
Thanks for pointing this out and explaining the process. Will remove in
next version.
Cheers,
