Hi Jan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: vnuma_nodes missing pnode 0 > > On 14.11.2022 07:43, Henry Wang wrote: > > Sorry, missed Anthony (The toolstack maintainer). Also added him > > to this thread. > > Indeed there's nothing x86-ish in here, it's all about data representation. > It merely happens to be (for now) x86-specific data which is being dealt > with.
Thank you for looking into this issue :) > > Internally I indicated to Jim that the way the code presently is generated > it looks to me as if 0 was simply taken as the default for "pnode". Yeah this also matches my first thought. I also did a git blame and didn't really see some recent commits that change this part of logic. > What I > don't know at all is whether the concept of any kind of default is actually > valid in json representation of guest configs. Let's see if Anthony has some ideas :) Kind regards, Henry > > Jan > > >> (Add x86 maintainers for more visibility) > >> > >> Hi x86 maintainers, > >> > >> Since this report might be related with the release, if you have time, > >> please have a look. Thank you very much. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Henry
