On 14.11.2022 07:43, Henry Wang wrote: > Sorry, missed Anthony (The toolstack maintainer). Also added him > to this thread.
Indeed there's nothing x86-ish in here, it's all about data representation. It merely happens to be (for now) x86-specific data which is being dealt with. Internally I indicated to Jim that the way the code presently is generated it looks to me as if 0 was simply taken as the default for "pnode". What I don't know at all is whether the concept of any kind of default is actually valid in json representation of guest configs. Jan >> (Add x86 maintainers for more visibility) >> >> Hi x86 maintainers, >> >> Since this report might be related with the release, if you have time, >> please have a look. Thank you very much. >> >> Kind regards, >> Henry
