On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: >> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a >>> little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We >>> have >>> - osstest.git >>> - there also is osstest/*.git which seems to be odd and seems to have been >>> inactive for a while (not very clear to me what these do) >>> - and we have old and inactive xentesttools/*.git >> They are not inactive. I have some patches for it and we are using >> it (Boris and me). > That is good to know. > >>> - and we are adding a new repo for XTF >>> >>> >>> Maybe, moving everything test related under testing/* or test/* would be >>> sensible, but that would cause some disruption (not sure how bad that >>> would be). It would address A, B and D. It wouldn't make C much worse than >>> now. >> I don't mind the xentesttools going under a 'test' directory. > @Ian, @George: Any other views regarding say osstest and the other osstest/* > directories? > > @Andrew: would something like test/xtf.git work
It would, although given a straight choice I would prefer xen-test-framework.git over its abbreviation. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
