On 7/1/2016 10:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.07.16 at 09:02, <cz...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
On 7/1/2016 9:56 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 06/30/16 21:47, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <asm/hvm/monitor.h>
#include <asm/monitor.h>
#include <asm/vm_event.h>
+#include <asm/paging.h>
#include <public/vm_event.h>
If this #include is not required to be exactly where it is, I believe
alphabetical order is preferred (so #include <asm/paging.h> would be
above #include <asm/vm_event.h>).
Didn't know that was the rule, ack.
The fundamental idea being that conflicts between patches are more
likely when everyone just adds to the end of a group.
Jan
Makes sense, thanks.
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
