>>> On 01.07.16 at 09:02, <cz...@bitdefender.com> wrote: > On 7/1/2016 9:56 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >> On 06/30/16 21:47, Corneliu ZUZU wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/monitor.c >>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ >>> #include <asm/hvm/monitor.h> >>> #include <asm/monitor.h> >>> #include <asm/vm_event.h> >>> +#include <asm/paging.h> >>> #include <public/vm_event.h> >> If this #include is not required to be exactly where it is, I believe >> alphabetical order is preferred (so #include <asm/paging.h> would be >> above #include <asm/vm_event.h>). > > Didn't know that was the rule, ack.
The fundamental idea being that conflicts between patches are more likely when everyone just adds to the end of a group. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
