>>> On 16.06.16 at 04:03, <quan...@intel.com> wrote:
> On June 14, 2016 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>> -    if ( amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi() != 0 )
>> +    rc = amd_iommu_update_ivrs_mapping_acpi();
>> +    if ( rc )
>>          goto error_out;
>> 
>>      /* initialize io-apic interrupt remapping entries */
>> -    if ( iommu_intremap && amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping() != 0 )
>> +    if ( iommu_intremap )
>> +        rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping();
>> +    if ( rc )
>>          goto error_out;
> 
> 
> Is it better to indent this if() here? Then,
> 
> +    if ( iommu_intremap )
> +    {
> +        rc = amd_iommu_setup_ioapic_remapping();
> +        if ( rc )
> +            goto error_out;
> +    }

What would this help (apart from increasing LOC and patch size)?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to