>>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <kon...@kernel.org> 04/06/16 4:05 AM >>> >On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:33:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 24.03.16 at 21:00, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile >> > @@ -75,7 +75,12 @@ efi-y := $(shell if [ ! -r >> > $(BASEDIR)/include/xen/compile.h -o \ >> > $(TARGET): $(TARGET)-syms $(efi-y) boot/mkelf32 >> > ./boot/mkelf32 $(TARGET)-syms $(TARGET) 0x100000 \ >> > `$(NM) -nr $(TARGET)-syms | head -n 1 | sed -e 's/^\([^ ]*\).*/0x\1/'` >> > + $(MAKE) -f $(BASEDIR)/Rules.mk -C test >> > >> > +install: >> > + $(MAKE) -f $(BASEDIR)/Rules.mk -C test install >> > +uninstall: >> > + $(MAKE) -f $(BASEDIR)/Rules.mk -C test uninstall >> >> Tests or examples should not be built by default. > >I can certainly make a seperate top destination called 'test' that will >take care of this? Or should it be called 'xsplice' ? 'xsplice-test' ?
The top level one would (imo naturally) be "tests", as there could be more than just the xSplice one(s). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel