>>> On 15.03.16 at 20:33, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 15/03/16 17:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> It looks like it could underflow at first glance. That is >> if i is zero and you get in the while loop with the >> i--. However the postfix expression is evaluated after the >> conditional so the loop is fine and won't execute (with i==0). >> >> However in spirit of defense programming lets clarify >> the loop conditional. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > This looks as if it will quieten Coverity, even though it is no > functional change.
Quieten Coverity? In what way? And why would it complain in the first place? As just in reply to Konrad, this is well defined behavior. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
