On 02/01/2016 06:49 PM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com <mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>> wrote:Current PVH implementation has never been described as production-ready. What is happening now with HVMlite is essentially bringing PVH to production-quality level. So should I s/PVH/HVMlite/g?
From user perspective that will be almost true. I am not sure it should be classified as PV mode anymore since it's really an HVM guest without any devices. But it's not there yet so it's too early to point your editor there.
BTW, I don't think the flowchart in the wiki is correct as far as PVH is concerned --- you can't use PVH unless HVM (and, in fact, PVHVM) is supported.
-boris
Or too much of a simlification? thanks,
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
