On 02/01/2016 02:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
On 02/01/2016 11:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes?
Yes, HVMlite is replacing PVH. Probably once we get dom0 support.
If that's a 'done deal', and it sounds like it is, it'd be useful to
have it integrated into:
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Understanding_the_Virtualization_Spectrum
particularly as there's no mention of HVMlite on the wiki, at all.
HVMlite is very new: domU hypervisor support has been added less than
two months ago and Linux patches are being reviewed as we speak
(FreeBSD, I believe, is supported).
It's unclear whether PVH, in its current dev state (at least here), is
worth-the-visit -- especially if HVMlite is "ComingSoon(tm)".
I suppose I'm looking for some guidance as to which to invest time in
while on Xen 4.6.0, ack'ing that neither PVH nor HVMlite are
production-ready.
Current PVH implementation has never been described as production-ready.
What is happening now with HVMlite is essentially bringing PVH to
production-quality level.
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
