Hi Dario, 2015-12-02 5:19 GMT-06:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>: > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 11:03 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: >> > On 2 Dec 2015, at 05:54, Meng Xu <xumengpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Maybe we could add some health warning and add a link to this >> > discussion? >> > Misconfiguration of the system will usually cause performance >> > degradation, even for the other schedulers, such as ARINC653, >> > credit, >> > credit2. >> >> That is the minimum IMHO for the wiki and xl. >> > I'm not so sure. Perhaps just a quick hint, in xl manpage, I'd say. > >> > What I'm thinking is how much expert information we should expose >> > to >> > users. Sometimes, exposing too much information may not be so >> > helpful. >> > Sometimes, more information just cause more confusion. >> >> Maybe just link to some of the theory on real-time schedulers (at >> least on the wiki). Maybe also to a couple of links to xen-devel@ >> threads like this one. >> > We can reference the thread on the wiki, and we can put a few sentences > about all this there. However, trying to link "some relevant theory" is > unpractical, as it won't be easy to define what both "some" and > "relevant" mean. :-) > > I'd be in favour (and ca do so) of adding a reference to the RT-Xen > website, and maybe to one of (the original?) RT-Xen paper. But nothing > more.
The first RT-Xen paper is for unicore scheduling and it didn't talk about how to configure the VMs. The most relevant RT-Xen paper for RTDS scheduler (right now) is the EMSOFT14 paper. Instead of linking to IEEE, which requires money to download, we can use this link: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mengxu/emsoft14/emsoft14.pdf Best, Meng -- ----------- Meng Xu PhD Student in Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mengxu/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
