On 02/11/15 10:56, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 30.10.15 at 20:05, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >> On 30/10/15 17:46, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> Rather than issuing a (mostly) useless separate message, rely on >>> domain_crash() providing enough data, and leverage the line number >>> information it prints. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> The messages are not completely useless, and they do save a round-trip >> to the debug symbols (which can be a very long RTT when dealing with >> customers). >> >> I agree that moving the domain_crash()'s is a good idea, but can we get >> away with just demoing the gprintk()s to gdprintk()s ? > How would that aid with the customer case (who wouldn't normally run > debug hypervisors)?
I suppose it wouldn't in the general case. XenServer now ships both regular and debug hypervisors to short circuit the first RTT when dealing with host crashes. A side effect is that guest crashes can be diagnosed more easily by switching to the debug hypervisor. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
