> -----Original Message----- > From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggi...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:27 PM > To: Wu, Feng <feng...@intel.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Cc: Tian, Kevin <kevin.t...@intel.com>; Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org>; > GeorgeDunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com>; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 15/17] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core > logic > handling > > On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 05:39 +0000, Wu, Feng wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggi...@citrix.com] > > > > Of course, that does not mean that we shouldn't add them for the > > > sake > > > of this patch, if we can't avoid doing that. But if we can avoid > > > them, > > > that is perhaps one more reason for doing things that way. > > > > Jan & Dario, thanks a lot for you guys' input. > > > Thanks to you for listening and replying. :-) > > > If you agree, I will remove > > the arch_vcpu_block_cancel() and maybe arch_vcpu_wake_prepare() > > as well, and implement the logic before VM-entry in V9, the patch > > will > > be coming soon. > > > Ok. Just to be sure I understand, you're plan is removing > arch_vcpu_block_cancel(), arch_vcpu_wake_prepare() and *leaving* > arch_vcpu_block()?
Yes, that is my plan, It seems to me it is hard to remove arch_vcpu_block(), or do you have any ideas? Thanks, Feng > > Regards, > Dario > -- > <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
