On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 05:39 +0000, Wu, Feng wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggi...@citrix.com]
> > Of course, that does not mean that we shouldn't add them for the > > sake > > of this patch, if we can't avoid doing that. But if we can avoid > > them, > > that is perhaps one more reason for doing things that way. > > Jan & Dario, thanks a lot for you guys' input. > Thanks to you for listening and replying. :-) > If you agree, I will remove > the arch_vcpu_block_cancel() and maybe arch_vcpu_wake_prepare() > as well, and implement the logic before VM-entry in V9, the patch > will > be coming soon. > Ok. Just to be sure I understand, you're plan is removing arch_vcpu_block_cancel(), arch_vcpu_wake_prepare() and *leaving* arch_vcpu_block()? Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
