>>> On 28.08.15 at 15:13, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: > Let me explain it in a different way: allocation is usually done with > xmalloc, but here you are using vmalloc. Why did you use vmalloc rather > than xalloc? AFAICT there is no improvement on ARM. > > If we open code the allocation, one could decide to use xmalloc which is > the common allocation. So what would be the drawback to use xmalloc vs > vmalloc?
Actually I think Julien's point is valid: If ARM can get away with xmalloc(), why should we force it to use the heavier vmalloc()? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
