>>> On 13.08.15 at 10:01, <christoffer.d...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12.08.15 at 18:18, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> Nonetheless, we still have to copy some table in Xen in order to modify >>> them and/or new one. I have in mind the FADT table to set the hypervisor >>> field and hiding the hypervisor specific data (GIC hyp, timer hyp...) to >>> avoid the kernel thinks there is hyp mode available. >> >> "Have to"? Or rather "would like to"? As said in another reply to >> Shannon, I didn't see any rationale spelled out for this fundamental >> difference to x86. >> > So the suggestion is to just edit the tables in place rather than > copying them and relying on Xen having already read whatever > 'original' information it needs before modifying them?
No, the suggestion is to leave the tables alone and teach Dom0 to ignore parts it has no interest in. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
