On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 08:04 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 07/28/2015 06:17 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > >> On 07/28/2015 06:29 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > > > >>> I'll make some performance tests on a big machine (4 sockets, 60 cores, > >>> 120 threads) regarding topology information: > >>> > > I'm asking this because, with hyperthreading involved, I've sometimes > > seen things being the worse when *not* (over)saturating the CPU > > capacity. > > Hmm, oversaturation shouldn't happen here. I've added -j 240 to let it > happen. > Oh, sorry... I was doing the math wrong (I was not counting the threads, which is funny, as this is pretty much all about threads! :-O)
> I think I'll have another try with a domU. This could be much more > "random" than dom0. > Indeed! Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
