On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 12:14 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > +> development. It is should not be used.* > > > Does it needs to be accepted on restore for N->N+1 purposes (or N+M > > > for > > > M>1 since you care about that)? Or does the conversion routine turn > > > it > > > into something else? > > > > The libxc toolstack record was used in the #LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT phase, > > but > > nothing (not even the conversion script) will generate one any more. > > Perfect.
By which I meant: Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
