On 22/07/15 11:27, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 11:37 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> +TOOLSTACK (deprecated) >> +---------------------- >> + >> +> *This record was only present for transitionary purposes during > "transitionary" isn't really a word... transitional is (even if it > sounds a bit odd to me)?
It very much is. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/transition It is an appropriate derivative in this case. > >> +> development. It is should not be used.* > Does it needs to be accepted on restore for N->N+1 purposes (or N+M for > M>1 since you care about that)? Or does the conversion routine turn it > into something else? The libxc toolstack record was used in the #LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT phase, but nothing (not even the conversion script) will generate one any more. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
