El 21/07/15 a les 18.11, Jan Beulich ha escrit: >>>> On 21.07.15 at 17:56, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: >> PSR was using EBADSLT and EUSERS which are not POSIX error codes, replace >> them with EINVAL and EOVERFLOW respectively. > > Considering that we use EINVAL for almost everything (well beyond > parameter checking I'm afraid), I don't think using this value for > something intended to yield a specific user mode error message is > really a good choice. Looking at the two respective hypervisor side > changes - how about e.g. using EDOM, EBADF, or ENXIO instead?
As suggested in a later email, replacing EBADSLT with ENOTSOCK seems better here. Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
