> On 16 Jul 2015, at 09:30, Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 09:08 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> >>> Does this imply this is already reviewed? >> >> No, that would be expressed by Reviewed-by. Acked-by merely >> means no objection by the maintainer for the change to go in. > > For my part I, perhaps wrongly, use Acked-by for both. If I haven't > actually carefully reviewed the change I will usually say so, e.g. "I > see XXX has reviewed this already, so that's fine by me" or something > similar (which I admit gets lost once it becomes just the tags). > > I can't speak for Ian or Wei (now CCd) but Ian at least I think operates > similarly. > > Ian.
We shouldn't have an argument about this now. I wrote some scripts yesterday to track Acked-by and Reviewed-by and it is clear that these two tags are not consistently used at the moment. Maybe something to pick up in 2 weeks Regards Lars _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
