>>> On 10.07.15 at 16:50, <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: >> v7: > > It looks like most of the libxl/libxc patches have been acked. It > seems to me that most of the hypervisor patches (1-3, 14-15) are > either ready to go in or pretty close. > > The main thing I think we're missing is the hvmloader stuff (5-7). Is > that right? > > I looked through it for subsets of patches we could usefully check in, > but it looks like the device MMIO range placement in the hvmloader > patches are pretty crucial for proper functioning, even if we're not > doing anything in particular with the memory layout (a la > strategy=host).
Yeah, putting in the hypervisor bits would make little sense without the hvmloader stuff going in at (about) the same time. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
