>>> On 20.05.15 at 17:21, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 20/05/15 16:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 17.05.15 at 22:03, <parth.di...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> From: Naresh Bhat <naresh.b...@linaro.org> >>> >>> Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen. >> >> This doesn't represent a valid reason for the code to be disabled, >> the more that ARM will want to support NUMA sooner or later. A >> valid reason would be if you'd have to introduce _a lot_ of code on >> the ARM side in order to make this build - if that's the case, please >> say so in the description, as from an architectural pov the absence >> of the respective ACPI tables should be no issue at all. > > The acpi/numa.c is calling a lot of arch specific function implemented > in (arch/x86/srat.c). The code in acpi/numa.c is very x86 related (such > as x2apic). > > I think disable the compilation is preferable for now given that there > is no board for testing the changes.
Or, as said in reply to patch 2, stubbing out the missing pieces in ARM code. As said there - let's not make more spaghetti of common code than it already is. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
