On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 11:01 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:59PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > with the rest of the file, where we return 1 on 0, rather > > than using libxl error codes. > > > > While being consistent is good I'm not very sure if we should go for 0/1 > rather than libxl error codes. I vaguely remember at some point we > discussed we should make xl exit code better but I don't remember the > exact details. > > Ian and Ian, what do you think?
TBH I'm not sure what exit() called with a negative number even results in. I think having more consistent exist codes from xl would be nice, but I don't think the libxl error codes are the ones to use, since they don't really map semantically onto what I would expect a CLI tool to fail with (I'm not sure what I would expect though, something a bit higher level on a command specific basis probably). _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
