On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:22:55PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 09.03.15 at 13:51, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > @@ -759,6 +784,14 @@ long do_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, 
> > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> >              return start_extent;
> >          args.domain = d;
> >  
> > +        if ( construct_memop_from_reservation(d, &reservation, &args) )
> > +        {
> > +            rcu_unlock_domain(d);
> > +            return start_extent;
> > +        }
> > +        args.nr_done      = start_extent;
> > +        args.preempted    = 0;
> 
> Remembering Andrew's comment on your patch introducing
> construct_memop_from_reservation(), the setting of
> args.domain visible in the context above should either be
> moved past that call, or be used by the function instead of
> passing d explicitly (in which case it is pretty clear that the
> function isn't free to clobber that structure field).
> 

My understanding was that he wanted me to move setting args.nr_done and
args.preempted after calling construct_memop_from_reservation. But then
here I missed args.domain. :-/

I will just move "args.domain = d" after the function call, if that's OK
with you.

Wei.

> Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to