>>> On 03.03.15 at 12:00, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: > On 03/03/2015 11:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 03.03.15 at 11:32, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>> On 03/03/2015 11:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> Also I'm not particularly happy with the name, as it suggests to be >>>> a statement about the initial P2M the guest gets handed - yet that >>>> is always virtually mapped. SIF_PERMANENT_VIRT_P2M is getting a >>>> little long I'm afraid, so I'm looking for better suggestions. >>> >>> SIF_VIRT_KERNEL_P2M? >>> SIF_FLAT_P2M? >> >> Neither reflects that this is not a statement about the initial P2M. > > What about SIF_VIRT_P2M_4TOOLS?
Yes, why not? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
