On 03/03/2015 11:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.03.15 at 11:32, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote:
On 03/03/2015 11:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Also I'm not particularly happy with the name, as it suggests to be
a statement about the initial P2M the guest gets handed - yet that
is always virtually mapped. SIF_PERMANENT_VIRT_P2M is getting a
little long I'm afraid, so I'm looking for better suggestions.
SIF_VIRT_KERNEL_P2M?
SIF_FLAT_P2M?
Neither reflects that this is not a statement about the initial P2M.
What about SIF_VIRT_P2M_4TOOLS?
At least this variant would give a hint regarding the consumer of the
p2m. Anybody wanting to know more should probably read the comment. :-)
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
