>>> On 27.02.15 at 15:41, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: Pygrub backports"):
>> >>> On 27.02.15 at 13:29, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> > I think the following commits from master should be considered for
>> > backport:
>>
>> Looks reasonable. Question is - do you still want this for 4.4.2 or
>> only afterwards? If for it, then can these please go in before RC2
>> (which really is only pending a push on the branches)?
>
> Well, TBH I was kind of surprised that we hadn't queued these as
> backports anyway. Backporting pygrub improvements is important for
> compatibility with newer guests.
>
> So if you don't mind too much, can we have them in 4.4.2 ? In which
> case I would push them right away.
Sure, go ahead.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
