Jan Beulich writes ("Re: Pygrub backports"):
> >>> On 27.02.15 at 13:29, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > I think the following commits from master should be considered for
> > backport:
>
> Looks reasonable. Question is - do you still want this for 4.4.2 or
> only afterwards? If for it, then can these please go in before RC2
> (which really is only pending a push on the branches)?
Well, TBH I was kind of surprised that we hadn't queued these as
backports anyway. Backporting pygrub improvements is important for
compatibility with newer guests.
So if you don't mind too much, can we have them in 4.4.2 ? In which
case I would push them right away.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
